Internet and freedom expression
google has pulled out China because it is not willing to desaign a search that blocked the Chinese govermment that may not be known to people . in countries uberal democarcy in the word thi is decision is generally welcomed.
but .in the democratic country uberal , australia , the goverment recently said it would pass alaw to block acces to certain to internet sites . These materials are prohibited including child pornography,briutality, incest, graphic images of violence , a detailed decription of a prohibited drug use, and information about sucide by interne sites that support the rights of persons who suffer from incurable diseases to end his life
A reader poll held in the sydney morning herald showed 96 percent of readers reject measures that ban . and only to percent support . More readers paticipated in this poll than the previous poll held internet sites , and results are most jompalng internet , such as steam engine ,is breaktrogh technology that has chaged the word . Today , the internet , you have acces to large libraries in the word indeed . in many respects , the information available via the internet is much greater than that found in the libraries , library that and much easier to find what you need .
Amazingly , all this happened without centralized planing , without the regulatory and supervisory agencis , other tha the system of allocating the site name and addres . the fact that something of importent could arise,
free from interference by the goverment and big bussines convincing many people that internet can individualistic and not centralized the realization of a vision that seeems very utopian anarcistic when assosiated with tthe dream of peter kropotkin , a prominent anarchitis movement in 19th century . That is probably why. many people are so convinced that the internet should released without restraints .
Maybe it's because Google is considered provider of unlimited information . Google 's collaboration wiht chinese censorship is seen asbatrayal of heavy the anarchitists hope that repessive goverments are given two options internet with all the opportunities that are not restricted in spreading information, or restrict Internet access only to the ruling elite and forget about progress in this the 21st century, as did Korea Utara.Realitasnya more complex. The Chinese government will never give in and accept Google's demands so as not to censor the Internet. The Chinese authorities will definitely find a way to replace services once provided by Google, with costs to be paid for it, and perhaps with the loss of efficiency. But the Internet will continue to rein in China too.
However, more important is that Google no longer give permission to use his name to political censorship. As can be expected, which accuses Google is trying to impose its own values to a foreign culture. Nonsense. Google reserves the right to choose how and with whom he wants to do business. People can also easily say that once, when Google do business with China, the authorities in this country is imposing its own values to Google.
0 responses to “Internet and freedom expression”